Another request to a legal foundation, mailed by the Social Work Center at St Anthony’s in order to document the mailing, has gone unanswered. Was it ever received by the Pacific Legal Foundation’s National Litigation Center? Requests , multiple, to the Southern Poverty law Center as well as numerous private legal firms have never received acknowledgement.
Please read the document below and if you think this effort to create freedom of speech for physicians is worthwhile, contact the Pacific Legal Foundation. Or, even if the mailed request was never delivered and it would be helpful to establish this possibility for other applicants, so tell them it would be helpful to allow requests they have received but have turned down or cannot fund to be posted on line so their financial supporters know which kind of cases they turn away. This may help with their fund raising efforts.
The current EFF website asks that persons wanting legal representation use info@EFF.org to so request.Previously, persons were given the name of a coordinator to contact. I did bring a written request to their physical office months ago and was told in person that my request was denied. I do not recall that there was any written denial.
Now,I have sent a request to info@EFF.org and received by return email a denial.EFF currently also states they may send info on cases to a list of Cooperating attorneys who are passionate about the same issues as the EFF. That does not appear to be the case with my request. Hmmm,individual sues government and insurance corporations then undergoes obstructions to basic constitutional rights and her safety is threatened. You pay the bills for other physicians failures to speak up about the corruption in healthcare today and you lose here!
The second attempt to ask for representation secondary to the failure of a major legal organization to even receive electronic communications,sent to EFF.org,is not even answered. Perhaps the EFF has not been the entity receiving and replying to my requests?Perhaps,like Ted Nace noted for the ACLU’s behavior, in his book Gangs of America, that the ACLU appears to take cases that further the rights of corporate entities, the EFF has begun to do so also? If you contribute to the EFF,perhaps you can have them offer to post all requests on line, unless the requesting persons refuses, so that the types of cases they are refusing is clear.
Date: Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: [#TL-L6735] request for representation: Cynthia Jeanne Lee MD
Thanks for contacting EFF. I’m sorry, but due to our limited resources we’re unable to provide representation in this matter or offer detailed legal analysis. I recommend you visit your local bar association: they usually provide low cost consultations at a very reasonable price.
I hope this information helps.
Legal Intake Coordinator
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Become a Member! https://www.eff.org/support
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> April 30, 2013
> Dear Attorneys at EFF.org,
> I am making a request for legal representation due to interference with my
> access to governmental services, attorney representation and record
> keeping for legal reasons. The scenerio includes having the interference
> begin while in legal proceedings with a state government and with
> insurance carriers. I have reason to believe that under the color of law,
> false accusations were made in order to arrange surveillance in order to
> interrupt the above mentioned legal processes.
> Among the many occurrences consistent with this surveillance are these
> three events that occurred in California. I purchased a prepaid phone. I
> registered it under an assumed name via the computers at the Long Haul
> infoshop in Berkeley. Later that day, I was in my vehicle at the state
> park above Oakland when a helicopter flew rather low overhead, my prepaid
> phone began beeping, and I found that 2 minutes of my talk time had
> disappeared. Since I bought this phone in order to attempt to make
> unobstructed calls to attorneys, this event prevented this access.
> A second event occurred when I made contact via fax with an attorney in
> Alaska. His office called back and his staff was unable to hear my end of
> the conversation. I realized too late that my phone’s mute button had
> turned on without any assistance from me. Pondering this issue, I waited
> two days then called an acquaintance in the peninsula. We spoke for two
> hours and he had no difficulty with hearing me at all. The mute light
> remained on nevertheless.
> A third event occurred when I called a friend in Texas by first contacting
> his family to let him know I needed to speak with him. He called back but
> the call immediately went to voicemail despite my answering timely. When I
> immediately called to check the voicemail for his contact info, I had to
> listen several times. Each time, the info became increasingly difficult to
> hear and was finally so garbled as to be unrecognizable as human speech.
> This is not the only time this has happened, leaving me with the question
> of whether the government can access the telephone company’s computers and
> erase information?
> My case is loaded with multiple constitutional questions including whether
> , under color of law, the government will intervene to assist one party in
> a legal dispute. My dispute with the government regarded the issue of
> experts not qualified under the Americans with Disabilities Act to advise
> the court while restricting my right to have a qualified expert address
> the court when I had an encephalopathy and hearing impairments.
> Thank you for your time and consideration.
> Cynthia Jeanne Lee MD
Now, I contact them to verify their policy of acknowledging requests and present the response here and also the 2011 request.
Problem: I asked for help at a tech center and a volunteer helped place all this info on the blog. Then, she said she needed to clean it up a little and much of it disappeared. Tech center closed before this could be figured out. I am looking for a person experienced at wordpress to help me out. I did send on to the EFF a statement that the Southern Poverty Law Center had no record of receiving any requests from me. The EFF failed to acknowledge this subsequent request for representation.
Date: Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:49 AM
From: cynthia lee <email@example.com>
Cynthia Jeanne Lee MD
C/o 3rd Floor SWC
150 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
Morris Seligman Dees
Southern Poverty Law Center
400 Washington Avenue
Montgomery, Alabama 36104
September 28, 2013
Via Fax from 415-440-7773 to 334-956-8491
Dear Mr. Dees,
I write to you directly because two prior requests for representation have gone unanswered and conceivably were not received. The legal situation I
am asking the Center to accept for representation includes federal and corporate collusion to prevent access to the courts and will unmask the collaboration between the insurance and pharmaceutical interests to keep forensic experts from being exposed as scientifically incompetent to render decisions on human behavior. The first assertion is that corporate collusion with the Federal government is preventing access to the courts can be explored while representing me. I was deliberately set up by a politically influential attorney who was representing me in a civil matter with insurance defense experts in order to keep certain information out of the public domain. These attorneys conspired to throw my cases. The cases included an Americans with Disabilities Act complaint intended to protect the ADA right to accommodation for competent experienced experts to advise the courts. The other cases involved insurance coverage for disability. These cases would have brought information on massive misdiagnosing by physicians, even affecting other physicians, into the public arena. This is a crucial concept in the criminal justice system because the etiology of human behavior is affected by toxic exposures currently not being considered because of obstruction to clinician education that is benefiting numerous politically influential industries. Finally there was collusion with the Department of Justice to attack my medical license and place me under surveillance by manufacturing an insurance fraud scam and a suspicious Muslim event at my medical practice. This final action was engineered utilizing pharmaceutical industry associated personnel and protected their financial interests in squelching my ability to pursue free speech in my home state of Texas.
My experiences in attempting to retain unbiased attorney representation for the stalking and other criminal behaviors involved in the stalking have convinced me of the need for an investigation into the insurance industry deliberately setting up plaintiff law firms to gather information for them, manipulate public perception, control access to cases (perhaps flood the market obstructing access to non-controlled firms, an antitrust issue), throw many cases. I believe this is being done in collusion with the U S DOJ, perhaps as a result of the Bush administration influences. For example, I have retained attorneys in Oregon, while having to relocate frequently because of the stalking, only to subsequently discover significant government related conflicts of interest. This includes one attorney, advertising as a private practitioner, claiming to have the contract for the ACLU, actually being a long term city municipal judge part time. I have many such experiences that can be explored for the issue of obstruction of access to the justice system.
Ursula Steck MSW is witnessing my attempts to obtain attorney representation. I have a weekly appointment with her. Her office phone number is 415-592-2788. It is my only phone contact number. Her fax number is 415-440-7770. Please document my two prior attempts to contact the SPLC for representation.
Cynthia Jeanne Lee MD
Never heard from this Berkeley Ca firm after faxing request for representation, feel free to call or write them and ask if they received the request
Here is the request I sent:
Meade Schrag Meade & Schrag LLP of Berkeley California
Here is their website http://www.meadeschrag.com/
Let them know if you would like them to consider representation
If you have a chance to encounter the attorneys from this California firm, ask why they did not respond. This link is the pdf of the letter faxed to their firm
This page should not be coming up as my home page and I do not know how that happened: see the posting “help me locate an attorney….as I will reward those who help manage web info as well as set up amicus arrangements
This is one of the qui tam firms that was asked to consider my claim that the pharmaceutical industry giants have bilked the American taxpayer by altering physician education to trick them into misdiagnosis of sleep disorders as psychiatric conditions requiring prescription psychiatric drugs. Medicare Part D has undoubtedly paid out millions for this scam. I was trying to locate law firms interested in this area before I was stalked out of Texas. I did not know about the Ritalin lawsuits that were filed around 2001. Those suits were dismissed by a judge. One of the principles in those class actions suits, Dickie Scruggs, was subsequently accused and pled out on charges of trying to bribe a judge. On a post (that I will eventually figure out to link to) I note that this attorney became addicted to pain killers after 2 back surgeries within 60 days. 2 back surgeries within 60 days? That is unusual. I wonder what went wrong. I think his attorney, John Keker, failed to explore if he was assaulted, rather than operated on! Note that Dickie Scruggs’s son was also prosecuted and pled out but is now petitioning to have this reversed based on new info that has come out demonstrating malfeasance between his lawyer and the Feds.
No more from this firm, Kenny & McCafferty as of October 31, 2011
If you know someone at this firm, ask them why I haven’t heard back from them. If you are as concerned as I am that there is informal blocking or surreptitious blocking of access to attorneys, feel free to email, phone or fax them. If all the government or the corporations that control them have to do is harass someone willing to sue to protect basic rights in order to stop them, you do not have basic rights intact either.
I post about the many unanswered requests for advocacy and/or representation so, if the person has never received the information, others who read my information can ask them to consider replying, hopefully positively. I have placed onto my blog the actual ads I ran in two legal newspapers in San Francisco in 2008. I rented a restaurant so there was a physical location attorneys could come to for dinner (courtesy) to meet me and to receive more information. Not a single attorney showed up. One of the newspapers alone supposedly has a paid circulation of over 9,000 attorneys. One of the insurance cases alone I had in litigation for over 500,000 in damages plus. I thought the stalking was ongoing harassment for filing the ADA suit against a government entity in Texas or for the insurance suits but I could not be sure until legal inquiries were made. IF we actually had access to the courts and were as “overlawyered” as some people claim , surely a number of attorneys would have presented to at least obtain information. After all, these legal newspapers carried numerous articles about this time that there was ongoing major corporate and law firm downsizing with attorneys looking for work by the droves….
Thomas H. Nelson of Portland area..Welches, Oregon
He is known as the first attorney to represent the interests of the attorney arrested by the FBI in Portland for association with the Madrid Spain bombing. His law offices were entered and files accessed. He sued the government over this.I figured he would at least know which attorneys were looking for cases like mine and which organizations were interested in amicus. He has purportedly turned down my case. His name was mentioned to me by Muslim activists. He has purportedly turned me down.
ODD. I emailed and faxed the request on October 3, 2011. The email and fax both appeared to sail through. Within an hour or two a rejection letter was emailed to me. I later noted that I had not signed the letter I faxed. I decided to refax the letter after signing it. This time, someone picked up the phone line and stated “wrong number”. The fax machine where I fax from, St. Anthony’s, does not give any paper documentation when this happens.
Also, that day, his office website thnelson.com would not come up so I used the bar association website to get an email and fax number. I mention this because, on a number of occasions, the Texas bar did not even have some of my prior attorneys listed unless I entered their name exactly and in full. For example, check “Shirley Madrid” on the Texas Bar. No contact information is available although it states she is looking for work! At least when I go on the Bar site. Perhaps there are pseudo Internet connections out there. Shirley Madrid was the attorney who joined Mr. Robert Provan’s law practice. She is USAF retired? unless I was misled about this connection. She appeared before the “suspicious Pakistani bachelor Muslim event” was staged at my office (mentioned below) and possibly has nothing to do with it.
If this does not sound like Mr. Nelson to not be helpful, please let him know about this situation. There was a “suspicious Muslim” event at my office which I believe was staged to give an employee an opportunity to complain to the government and allow them to put me under surveillance. He was creating a disturbance and demanding I sign immigration papers for him “vouching for his identity”. That is why I thought Mr. Nelson would be of assistance.
I will scan these documents when I can get access to a scanner and computer.
Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
Request for representation faxed on September 28, 2011
No reply to faxed request as of October 31, 2011
Southern Poverty Law Center (4th request) No reply to first 3 attempts so I located an email for Morris Dees on the Bar site (firstname.lastname@example.org
Request faxed and emailed on September 28, 2011, No reply as of October 31,2011
Mr. Michael I. Spiegel replied he received my fax. He has never replied regards to further info or a yes or no. As of October 31, 2011
No reply from Terence L. redmond, Jonathon Emord, or Johnny Griffen III of Sacramento, or John E. Hill of Oakland (latest faxed request September 7, 2011-prior faxed request location?) john e. hill aug 31 2011 or Stephen MacLean of Albert G. Stoll Jr./ A law Firm (San Francisco)
Here is the Stephen Mac Lean request which he never acknowledged, updated 8/2/13
The Scarlet Law Firm of San Francisco had the record for the fastest NO! in the West until Thomas H. Nelson
Mike Moore of the Mike Moore Law Firm LLC of Flowood
His request was faxed on September 30, 2011 and no reply has arrived yet as of October 31, 2011
He is well known for the tobacco class actions and has been a prominent and respected politician in Mississippi for years. Look him up. Feel free to call him and ask if he received my request and encourage him to consider it and let me know he is considering it. Tell him to Google my comments about his good friend Dickie Scruggs. Mr. Scruggs’s drug addiction sounds iatrogenic to me and suspicious to boot.
Request to Donald Heller J.D.Heller Request of Sacramento faxed October 12, 2011 Re: Educational deficiencies of forensic specialists No answer as of October 31, 2011, update 8/2/13
Request to Eva Patterson of the Equal Justice Society faxed October 11, 2011
Answer received signed David Salniker dated Oct 17, 2011. David Salniker is listed as the Director of Administration & Finance. They have refused advocacy on the issue of “ending the death penalty by demonstrating that the education of the forensic experts was constructed with huge holes in it, possibly deliberately”. I was referred to a group called Death Penalty focus of California. I have already attended their events (and have no more money to do so). They didn’t want to listen. Even that actor who is on their board didn’t seem to understand. I wish I could speak to Sister Prejean (the nun re: Dead Man Walking). after reading her book, The Death of Innocents, I felt she would understand the outrage and appropriateness of my protest, that the ADA applies here.
Request to Peter Graham Cohn of Petaluma faxed October 10, 2011
No answer as of October 31, 2011
Advocacy request to Dr. Jane Orient faxed September 29, 2011
Letter of reply received. She is not aware of a HIPAA policy to allow the Feds to keep info about you (if you are a licensed professional) that you cannot access but is shared with different government groups, like law enforcement. She wants me to research it and send her more info. My copies of this document (from the 2004 edition of the AMA handbook on HIPAA) disappeared a long time ago and she surely has much better access to this info than I do.
Advocacy request to Zahra Billoo, Esq faxed February14, 2011 No answer as of Oct 31, 2011
Advocacy request to Samina Faheem faxed February 11, 2011 No answer as of Oct 31, 2011
request to Monico Pavich & Spevack attn :Macaloon J. D. R. N. faxed September 21, 2011 and no answer as of October 31, 2011
Time for a discussion of whether the American public is being scammed by nonsense that we can actually receive representation even if communications are not intercepted. Take, for example, testimony to Congress by Professor William Weaver documented in his online article
The So-Called “whistleblower organizations”: Munchausen by Proxy by William G. Weaver, J.D., Ph.D of http://www.nswbc.org
as he explains how whistleblowers are misled by multiple organizations obstensibly set up to represent them but which actually function to suck funds out of circulation that should be used to arrange exposure.
A little bird told me about this great firm and how aggressive they were in representing clients. I reviewed their site and found that they had both a civil division and a criminal division. One of the principles was connected to war crimes legal proceedings in the Balkans. Certainly, highly connected politically. As of October 7th, 2011 I am not aware of any reply. Any firm replying should do so with as many types of communication possible including U S mail and certified or preferably registered mail.
Please review the document because of my explanation of how the textbooks are cooked.
I found this attorney associated with the Melvin I Belli Society. It has been 3 weeks and no written or otherwise reply at all. Are attorneys obligated to acknowledge requests for representation?
I sought out Mr. Griffin for representation due to his familiarity with the Patriot Act and the fact it can be used for commercial spying on Americans and not to their benefit. I have good reasons for believing that National Security Letters and other means were used to gather information about me from usually protected sources (because of a conversation I had with an executive secretary at the Travis County Medical Society). Also, if one does not have the right to know that records were obtained, one cannot review these records for accuracy. Why would I seek out an attorney with Patriot Act experience? At my medical office in Austin Texas, a man presented as a patient and represented himself as single, Muslim and Pakistani. Since I had experience with female patients identifying as Muslim (and accompanied by their spouse), I had come to understand that it was unlikely a Muslim male would seek out a female physician. After 9/11, this same man came into my office, behaved belligerently (upsetting my front office staff who came to get me immediately) and he demanded I complete and sign forms attesting to his identity for the purposes of going out of the country. I certainly cannot know if my office staff alerted law enforcement but I would not have been surprised if she had, all things considered. The phone call with the man purporting to be Mr. Griffin was strange (as documented in the fax document scanned and linked below) and I do not believe that was Mr. Griffin on the telephone with me. To that end, how hard is it for the Feds to have some woman call, identify herself as me, then be abusive or inappropriate? The use of identity doubles is a very old game.
My fax to his office (click below) to alert him as to the situation. I have never heard back. Sept 22, 2011. This is not the first time I have tried to alert him that someone with a different speaking voice was using his identity on a telephone call to this prospective client. I eventually heard him interviewed on NPR and it was clearly not the same person’s voice.