The current EFF website asks that persons wanting legal representation use info@EFF.org to so request.Previously, persons were given the name of a coordinator to contact. I did bring a written request to their physical office months ago and was told in person that my request was denied. I do not recall that there was any written denial.
Now,I have sent a request to info@EFF.org and received by return email a denial.EFF currently also states they may send info on cases to a list of Cooperating attorneys who are passionate about the same issues as the EFF. That does not appear to be the case with my request. Hmmm,individual sues government and insurance corporations then undergoes obstructions to basic constitutional rights and her safety is threatened. You pay the bills for other physicians failures to speak up about the corruption in healthcare today and you lose here!
The second attempt to ask for representation secondary to the failure of a major legal organization to even receive electronic communications,sent to EFF.org,is not even answered. Perhaps the EFF has not been the entity receiving and replying to my requests?Perhaps,like Ted Nace noted for the ACLU’s behavior, in his book Gangs of America, that the ACLU appears to take cases that further the rights of corporate entities, the EFF has begun to do so also? If you contribute to the EFF,perhaps you can have them offer to post all requests on line, unless the requesting persons refuses, so that the types of cases they are refusing is clear.
Date: Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: [#TL-L6735] request for representation: Cynthia Jeanne Lee MD
Thanks for contacting EFF. I’m sorry, but due to our limited resources we’re unable to provide representation in this matter or offer detailed legal analysis. I recommend you visit your local bar association: they usually provide low cost consultations at a very reasonable price.
I hope this information helps.
Legal Intake Coordinator
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Become a Member! https://www.eff.org/support
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, email@example.com wrote:
> April 30, 2013
> Dear Attorneys at EFF.org,
> I am making a request for legal representation due to interference with my
> access to governmental services, attorney representation and record
> keeping for legal reasons. The scenerio includes having the interference
> begin while in legal proceedings with a state government and with
> insurance carriers. I have reason to believe that under the color of law,
> false accusations were made in order to arrange surveillance in order to
> interrupt the above mentioned legal processes.
> Among the many occurrences consistent with this surveillance are these
> three events that occurred in California. I purchased a prepaid phone. I
> registered it under an assumed name via the computers at the Long Haul
> infoshop in Berkeley. Later that day, I was in my vehicle at the state
> park above Oakland when a helicopter flew rather low overhead, my prepaid
> phone began beeping, and I found that 2 minutes of my talk time had
> disappeared. Since I bought this phone in order to attempt to make
> unobstructed calls to attorneys, this event prevented this access.
> A second event occurred when I made contact via fax with an attorney in
> Alaska. His office called back and his staff was unable to hear my end of
> the conversation. I realized too late that my phone’s mute button had
> turned on without any assistance from me. Pondering this issue, I waited
> two days then called an acquaintance in the peninsula. We spoke for two
> hours and he had no difficulty with hearing me at all. The mute light
> remained on nevertheless.
> A third event occurred when I called a friend in Texas by first contacting
> his family to let him know I needed to speak with him. He called back but
> the call immediately went to voicemail despite my answering timely. When I
> immediately called to check the voicemail for his contact info, I had to
> listen several times. Each time, the info became increasingly difficult to
> hear and was finally so garbled as to be unrecognizable as human speech.
> This is not the only time this has happened, leaving me with the question
> of whether the government can access the telephone company’s computers and
> erase information?
> My case is loaded with multiple constitutional questions including whether
> , under color of law, the government will intervene to assist one party in
> a legal dispute. My dispute with the government regarded the issue of
> experts not qualified under the Americans with Disabilities Act to advise
> the court while restricting my right to have a qualified expert address
> the court when I had an encephalopathy and hearing impairments.
> Thank you for your time and consideration.
> Cynthia Jeanne Lee MD
Now, I contact them to verify their policy of acknowledging requests and present the response here and also the 2011 request.
Problem: I asked for help at a tech center and a volunteer helped place all this info on the blog. Then, she said she needed to clean it up a little and much of it disappeared. Tech center closed before this could be figured out. I am looking for a person experienced at wordpress to help me out. I did send on to the EFF a statement that the Southern Poverty Law Center had no record of receiving any requests from me. The EFF failed to acknowledge this subsequent request for representation.
Date: Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:49 AM
From: cynthia lee <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cynthia Jeanne Lee MD
C/o 3rd Floor SWC
150 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
Morris Seligman Dees
Southern Poverty Law Center
400 Washington Avenue
Montgomery, Alabama 36104
September 28, 2013
Via Fax from 415-440-7773 to 334-956-8491
Dear Mr. Dees,
I write to you directly because two prior requests for representation have gone unanswered and conceivably were not received. The legal situation I
am asking the Center to accept for representation includes federal and corporate collusion to prevent access to the courts and will unmask the collaboration between the insurance and pharmaceutical interests to keep forensic experts from being exposed as scientifically incompetent to render decisions on human behavior. The first assertion is that corporate collusion with the Federal government is preventing access to the courts can be explored while representing me. I was deliberately set up by a politically influential attorney who was representing me in a civil matter with insurance defense experts in order to keep certain information out of the public domain. These attorneys conspired to throw my cases. The cases included an Americans with Disabilities Act complaint intended to protect the ADA right to accommodation for competent experienced experts to advise the courts. The other cases involved insurance coverage for disability. These cases would have brought information on massive misdiagnosing by physicians, even affecting other physicians, into the public arena. This is a crucial concept in the criminal justice system because the etiology of human behavior is affected by toxic exposures currently not being considered because of obstruction to clinician education that is benefiting numerous politically influential industries. Finally there was collusion with the Department of Justice to attack my medical license and place me under surveillance by manufacturing an insurance fraud scam and a suspicious Muslim event at my medical practice. This final action was engineered utilizing pharmaceutical industry associated personnel and protected their financial interests in squelching my ability to pursue free speech in my home state of Texas.
My experiences in attempting to retain unbiased attorney representation for the stalking and other criminal behaviors involved in the stalking have convinced me of the need for an investigation into the insurance industry deliberately setting up plaintiff law firms to gather information for them, manipulate public perception, control access to cases (perhaps flood the market obstructing access to non-controlled firms, an antitrust issue), throw many cases. I believe this is being done in collusion with the U S DOJ, perhaps as a result of the Bush administration influences. For example, I have retained attorneys in Oregon, while having to relocate frequently because of the stalking, only to subsequently discover significant government related conflicts of interest. This includes one attorney, advertising as a private practitioner, claiming to have the contract for the ACLU, actually being a long term city municipal judge part time. I have many such experiences that can be explored for the issue of obstruction of access to the justice system.
Ursula Steck MSW is witnessing my attempts to obtain attorney representation. I have a weekly appointment with her. Her office phone number is 415-592-2788. It is my only phone contact number. Her fax number is 415-440-7770. Please document my two prior attempts to contact the SPLC for representation.
Cynthia Jeanne Lee MD
Dismissal of case by Federal Judge Attorneys: Katya Komisaruk,William M. Simpich and Kenneth Frucht in 1999 to great fanfare sued the CIA and others in a class action because of the CIA’s involvement in bringing crack cocaine to our inner cities. This case was consolidated in Federal Court in Gainesville Florida and subsequently dismissed because the attorneys failed to work it. Are they still receiving referrals based on their prowess on suing the government?
Click on the pictures or click on the jpeg for copies of the dismissal
Help me located Donna Warren for her opinion of the dismissal of the case